About Us  > Blog

New Study on Prosper Returns and Dynamics

by Chris Larsen on 06/10/08

One of our primary objectives in making Prosper market data fully transparent and freely available via an API is to allow and encourage anyone to study the Prosper market and consumer credit markets in general.  We deeply appreciate the level of diligence and analysis so many have contributed using Prosper’s marketplace data.  We are also very encouraged that an increasing number of economists and professional credit analysts have taken the time to conduct deep studies of the market and share their conclusions publicly.

One such study was released yesterday by Economists Ginger Zhe Jin and Seth Freedman of the University of Maryland.  The study looks at Prosper’s market since inception to determine average returns and other interesting conclusions about the market. Among their findings:

  1. The average Prosper returns since inception were estimated at 6.05% with a 5.72% standard deviation and were trending up as credit quality continues to improve (see table 9 and figure 8.3).
  2. The highest returns were in Near Prime loans (grades B-D) at an average of 8.27%, followed by Prime loans (grades AA & A) at 6.78% and sub-prime loans at 1.73%.
  3. The probability of default of a Prosper loan peaks at month ten and then edges down (see Figure 9). This is a major reason why Prosper’s performance tool shows more conservative returns. Prosper’s performance tool does not adjust for this later default moderation, which is significant given that the average age of the Prosper portfolio is currently 9.7 months (i.e. at the peak of the default curve).
  4. The study showed that the highest returns occurred for loans priced up to 25%. Loans funded at more than 25% actually showed lower returns because defaults increased disproportionately. This implies that borrowers willing to pay very high rates show higher adverse selection, which is logical (see Figure 8.1).
  5. The study found that lenders learn quickly – adjusting their bids and strategies as performance is revealed. New lenders also learn from their observations of earlier lenders in adjusting to marketplace dynamics.

Chris Larsen is the CEO and Co-founder of Prosper.

Leave a Comment

Prosper moderates all comments and will approve those that are directly relevant to the post. We do not publish comments that are spam, are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person.

(required) Email will not be published.

Comment Policy


To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

10 Responses

Joey Lawrance | June 10th, 2008 at 9:16 pm

I concur with the assessment. Incidentally, this is one of the reasons I don’t use portfolio plans: although I can specify a minimum interest rate, I cannot specify a maximum interest rate. Personally, I’m only comfortable bidding from 10% to 25%. Anything lower isn’t worthwhile, anything higher is too risky. Is there any work on screening listings based on the maximum interest rate?

Martin | June 11th, 2008 at 1:21 am

Joey, my thoughts exactly! I can only specify the minimum rate, not the maximum. Did anyone go through the study and read the assumptions made? Are they agreeable/realistic?

Yankeefan | June 11th, 2008 at 7:59 am

If we take figure 9 at face value as applying to all loans, it would indicate that many loans come current after 12 months or so.

More likely, the longer durations shown reflect a different loan mix than the more recent ones, with different risk characteristics.

Would that the authors had developed “roll rates” or rates of going late by loan age, rather than just an average percentage already late as shown in Firgure 9.

That said, I plan to read the report more carefully- and thank the authors for their work.

NewHorizon | March 3rd, 2010 at 8:59 am

The link to the study is dead.

Also, Economists Ginger Zhe Jin and Seth Freedman published updated studies – the latest one entitled “Learning by Doing with Asymmetric Information:
Evidence from Prosper.com” dated Feb 1, 2010.

Prosper Blog | March 3rd, 2010 at 1:30 pm

The new link to the study is now live. Sorry for any confusion.

NewHorizon | March 3rd, 2010 at 3:08 pm

OK, thanks. But now references to the study no longer match up. Example: Table 9 shows something else entirely now. And I’m unable to find figure 8.3, etc. Some of the facts have changed too. Instead of “The probability of default of a Prosper loan peaks at month ten and then edges down”, for example, the study says, “Our prediction regressions suggest that misperformance does not have a statistically significant increase after month 18.”

Prosper Blog | March 3rd, 2010 at 3:20 pm

It is not uncommon for academic research and academic working papers to be updated. We hope the working link with the latest available version of the study is helpful to those who are interested in following the progress of the study.

NewHorizon | March 4th, 2010 at 11:10 am

“We hope the working link with the latest available version of the study is helpful to those who are interested in following the progress of the study.”

In support of this, I’d like to also post this link to an even more recent study – again by Seth Freedman and Ginger Zhe Jin – performed on the Prosper data. This study is dated 2/1/2010.


It’s heady stuff, as usual. But those interested in following the progress of the study might like to at least check out the Abstract and/or the Conclusion sections.


posted in Borrowers,Prosper News 10 comments »

Connect with us



Prosper Reports Record First Quarter

By Prosper on 05/21/15   [ 0 ]

Prosper Marketplace just closed out our first quarter and we’re very pleased to report that it was our strongest yet. In the first quarter of 2015, Prosper facilitated a record $595 million in loans through the platform, up 200% from the first quarter a year ago. We attribute this to the increasing awareness of Prosper [...]

Read More

Fertility Treatments in the United States: Sentiment, Costs and Financial Impact

By Prosper on 05/20/15   [ 3 ]

Overview From April 16 – 21, Prosper Marketplace sponsored a study of 213 American females between the ages of 25 and 54 from MarketCube, a research panel company, about their experiences trying to conceive a child with fertility treatments. Each respondent had to meet the following criteria to participate: Female Between 25 – 54 years [...]

Read More

Prosper Marketplace Survey Finds Cost is the Biggest Cause of Concern for Women Considering Fertility Treatments

By Prosper on 05/20/15   [ 0 ]

By Cheryl Law In February of 2015, Prosper Marketplace announced that we had acquired our first company – American Healthcare Lending (now Prosper Healthcare Lending). Since that time, we’ve learned a lot about the healthcare industry and the opportunity to bring a consumer-friendly personal loan product to people who need to finance medical procedures. As awareness [...]

Read More

« Older Entries

Monthly Archive

Notice: Blogs and other materials posted on or linked from this page that use the name "Prosper" generally use that name to refer to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. if published before January 31, 2013 and to refer to Prosper Funding LLC if published on or after February 1, 2013.