Join Now | Sign In

Site Update – June 24, 2008

06/24/08 posted by Andrew Martinez-Fonts

Last night we made another update to the Prosper site. The update includes a few nice changes for lenders and some important process changes. 

Adjust the rate on your portfolio plans

When you add a portfolio plan to your lender account, now you can adjust the average bidding rate on your portfolio plan from the “Fund your plan” page:

Adjust Average Bid of Portfolio slices

Just change the average bid rate, and all of the slices that make up your plan will be changed accordingly. This makes customizing your plan even easier. View your portfolio plans now.

Manual bidding guidance

As of this release, a new reminder may appear when you’re bidding on a borrower listing and the bid rate may be too low to account for the risk associated with the listing based on the estimated loss rate for similar listings. For example, if, after taking the default rate into account, you are aiming for a 6% estimated return, in most cases you would need to bid considerably more on a D listing than on a AA listing because D loans normally experience a much higher estimated loss rate and therefore you are taking on more risk. 

Here’s what the new message looks like:

Manual bidding guidance message

You can read more on this help page.

More bankruptcy data

As foreshadowed in the May site update, we are now providing chapter and filing date information on bankruptcies filed by borrowers. If you have a loan where the borrower has filed bankruptcy, you’ll see something like this on the loan detail page:

More Bankruptcy Data

Keep in mind that in some cases we don’t have the chapter and filing date for the borrower. In those cases, that information will not be provided in the message box.

Borrowers will now sign promissory notes for their loan

As of today, borrowers will be required to return to the Prosper site and sign the promissory notes which evidence their loan, before loan proceeds are disbursed. Until now, borrowers have not had to sign all of the notes themselves because they authorized Prosper to do so on their behalf.

Borrowers will receive an email notifying them that their loan is ready to sign, and will have 7 days to return to the site and sign the promissory notes. We will remind the borrower via email and phone calls every day until the 7 days is up, at which point, if the borrower has not responded, the loan will be cancelled.

Although this new process may add some additional time before loan funding, we expect that this change will reduce immediate loan payoffs and enhance the legal enforceability of Prosper promissory notes.

Self-employed borrower changes

Borrowers who are self-employed will now have their DTI displayed as “Not calculated”.

This is due primarily to the wide variety of business activities engaged in by self-employed borrowers, which present equally wide variations in the forms of income and tax statements often provided to verify income. As a result, income verification for self-employed borrowers is extremely difficult and time-consuming.

Additionally, the DTI of full-time, part-time, and retired borrowers who cannot verify their income will be displayed as “Not calculated”. Previously, it was displayed as “Not available”.

Stated income changes

The “Income range” field on the listing page has been renamed “Stated income”, and the stated income of every borrower will always be displayed. This includes self-employed borrowers and wage earners who indicate that they cannot document their income.

The employment section of the listing page will now look like this for self-employed borrowers:

Employment Section of Listing Page

We hope you find these changes helpful, and look forward to your feedback. If you have any requests for the next release, please leave a comment.

Andrew is a Product Manager at Prosper.

Posted in Site Updates




12 Responses


phredy148 | June 24th, 2008 at 9:58 am

I am very concerned about what might have caused the change to the borrowers signing their promissary notes. Could someone from Prosper expand on the need for the change? Is there some weakness in the old method that would effect the collectibility of the notes?


NewHorizon | June 24th, 2008 at 10:43 am

The “Prosper announces institutional lender platform” and “Same day transfers” sections of this announcement (as Emailed to lenders) are missing from this blog entry.


RateLadder | June 24th, 2008 at 11:31 am

@NewHorizon

Those changes are old news:

http://blog.prosper.com/2008/05/19/site-update-%e2%80%93-may-19-2008/

http://blog.prosper.com/2008/06/02/greetings-from-business-development/


NewHorizon | June 24th, 2008 at 11:49 am

@RateLadder: OK, then it seems I missed - or forgot about - that news. But I find myself still not knowing why the “old news” was still included, then, in the site update announcement which Prosper Emailed last night. Not a big deal, really. Just a tad curious. (… and a little confusing … obviously. :) :) )


RateLadder | June 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

@NewHorizon

The email I got last night said is was the monthly newsletter.

To me it seems that it was simply good timing to send the newsletter right after the update. That way news from the month can be included with the site update news.

But that is just my speculation.


NewHorizon | June 24th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

@RL re: “The email I got last night said is was the monthly newsletter.”

In the email I got last night, the intro to the whole newsletter reads:

“Prosper Site Update

Dear xxxx,

We have made a few updates to our site that include some nice changes for Lenders and some important process changes. We hope that you will find these changes helpful and look forward to your feedback.”

Maybe “a few updates” was meant to refer to more than updates made this month (June ‘08).

…And maybe I’m the only one confused by this.

re: “But that is just my speculation.”
Fair enough. No problem. So I’ll just keep watching this space for some non-speculation… ;)


Jim Adcock | June 24th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

While I appreciate Prosper trying to strenghten the enforceability of contracts, I have to object to anything that extends the float that already exists. There is already far too much time my money sits earning nothing. I really like the concept behind this website but the float problem from the lender perspective really needs to be addressed.


Ed Giedgowd | June 24th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

There has never been any weakness in the manner in which borrowers have signed Prosper promissory notes. Prosper’s notes are and always have been fully enforceable. We did not have to make this change, as we were not receiving any complaints about the manner in which the notes have been signed.


Xenon481 | June 24th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

@Ed Giedgowd:

Then why does this blog post specifically state “and enhance the legal enforceability of Prosper promissory notes”?


Lender25 | July 2nd, 2008 at 6:37 pm

@Ed Giedgowd:

I agree with what Jim and Xenon have stated, and would appreciate a response to Xenon’s question. From my perspective, the situation is either:

(a)if the promissory notes signed by Prosper on the Borrowers’ behalf are indeed less enforceable than those signed by the Borrowers’ themselves, or Prosper anticipates that they may be, then this is something that Lenders should definately be notified of by Prosper.

or,

(b)if Prosper has not seen any enforceability issues with the promissory notes signed by Prosper on the Borrowers’ behalf, or does not anticipate any enforceability issues, then having the Borrowers sign the promissory notes themselves is wasting Lenders’ time and money.

Trackbacks

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Subscribe          RSS Text

  • Google Reader or Homepage
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to My AOL

Recent Comments

  • jmathree: Thanks for these posts Bryan! Good advice for new lenders.
  • Prosper Blog: In response to mothandrust and cardinalflyer’s comments: There is a “rule of thumb”...
  • Prosper Blog: In response to zcommodore’s comment: First, we want to thank those who took the time find and...
  • cardinalflyer: It appears a lot of bidders stop bidding when their loans go into past due status. I have a hard time...
  • zcommodore: I find it amazing that this “oversight” regarding the lending agreement discrepancy is just...
  • Prosper in the News

    • In Credit Crunch, Lending To Each Other
    • Q&A: ‘Bringing Together George Bailey and Gordon Gekko’
    • Fast 50 2008: Prosper
    • New lending site helps people
    • Prosper CEO sees company benefiting from credit crunch
    • Innovation: Website Makes it Easier for Individuals to Borrow & Lend
    • Person-To-Person Lending Flourishes on Web
    • Smart Investments that Outpace Inflation
    • Lending To Relatives? Read This.
    Performance Award
    Home | Personal Loans | Bid on Loans | Community | My Account | Help | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map
    Developers | Privacy & Security | Policies | Terms of Use | Legal Agreements | Legal Compliance

    Prosper, Prosper.com, and the Prosper logo are registered trademarks or service marks of Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
    Copyright © 2005-2008 Prosper Marketplace, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Click to Verify - This site has chosen a VeriSign SSL Certificate to improve Web site security Site privacy statement reviewed by TRUSTe