Join Now   Sign In | Help


Collections – Hardship Arrangement are Benefiting Lenders

11/2/09 posted by Doug Fuller    

One of the key challenges in collecting on unsecured installment loans is providing the borrower an incentive to continue to making payments when they come under financial distress. If you don’t make a payment  on a credit card you can’t keep charging on it. In the case of a house or a vehicle loan, the lender can repo/foreclose on the secured asset. On an unsecured loan, the borrower has already received the funds – so there is no loss of utility when they stop paying.

One way Prosper has been successful incenting distressed borrowers to pay is by offering alternative payment arrangements.  If borrowers  contact us before they have become 30 days past due, we can arrange an alternate payment schedule. If they meet the promised payments, we can continue to report the account as “Current” with the Credit Bureaus.  We’re not waiving interest, we’re not waiving late fees, we can’t change how the loan appears on the Prosper Site – all we’re doing is not dinging the person’s credit report. It is a carrot.

Starting in December, we have used this carrot for borrowers who contact us prior to being placed with collections (less than 31 DPD). We require an explanation of the “hardship” which is causing the problem with the payment schedule (usually loss of a job). We do not over scrutinize the hardships documented. What we are looking to do is to reach a monthly amount that the borrower will continue to pay for some period of time (usually 3 or 4 months). Even at a reduced amount, if we can keep them paying, it is dollars flowing to lenders. In addition this can build goodwill with borrowers and improve the future payment performance on loans.

Since December, we have logged 327 of these plans. As of today, 251 of them are still active – that is an excellent retention rate. Right now this is one of our most effective tools to continuing payments for lenders.

We are working on a major system project that will provide the tools that would allow us to extend this procedure to an “outreach” for all borrowers who exceed 15 DPD.  

Is it just giving away money? No.  We are not changing the interest rate – so the situation is one of “funds delayed” not “funds abandoned”. As long as people keep paying, it is a good thing. One advantage of these payment plans is that they do not incur Collection Agency Fees. To date, this program has accounted for more than $225K in payments —some portion of which would not have received lenders.


Leave a Comment

(required)
(required) Email will not be published.
 

Comment Policy

 

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

9 Responses


Edna Smith | November 3rd, 2009 at 9:53 am

Exactly where in the LRA does it allow Prosper to do this?


Prosper Blog | November 3rd, 2009 at 6:07 pm

In addition to our obligation to not forgive interest or principal, we are obligated to use “commercially reasonable” efforts to collect the maximum amount for our lenders. As demonstrated by similar programs used by lenders across the consumer lending space, this is a commerically reasonable effort that is bringing in incremental dollars for our lenders.


BigCowboy | November 3rd, 2009 at 8:34 pm

Please flag these payments in the note detail of the loans involved. I like the idea and think it is a good one, but the lenders should have been notified of the change MUCH earlier (i.e. December last year).


mothandrust | November 4th, 2009 at 12:14 am

I had a loan where the borrower was consistently making 1/2 payments every month. 3 days after the last payment was made, Prosper charged-off the loan and the borrower never made any more payments after that. I wish Prosper would not charge-off loans where the borrower is making regular payments.


Edna Smith | November 4th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

@ Prosper Blog

You are mistaken however, because that is only for lenders that have agreed to the new LRA, not prior ones.

In the prior LRA’s your language as you quoted was not included.


mothandrust | November 5th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

I appreciate Prosper thinking of ways that might benefit lenders, but why not poll lenders first? It’s our money after all, and I for one would have voted ‘no’ on this idea–I think borrowers will pay their other bills (which aren’t accepting reduced payments) and I will end up will less in the end.


Mee Thavong | November 5th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

Yes….let’s be reasonable. We are dealing with people.


Brad | November 10th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

Doug,
Will these modification lead to situations where borrowers will be facing a large lump sum balloon payment at the end that they cannot pay off? Or will Prosper continue to be flexible with these borrowers to work out a payment plan at the end of 3 years?

Thanks


Brad | November 11th, 2009 at 12:47 am

Doug,
Another concern that has been expressed is the reporting of performance statistics. If loans that are under negotiations with borrowers are not identified in some way, it will skew the numbers and lead lenders to make poor judgments as to what are viable loan characteristics.

I think you and I agree, the best way to deal with bad loans is to not select them in the first place.

So is there any plan to somehow flag these loans in the performance data?

Thanks.


Posted in Collections, Featured, Lend To Others, Lenders, Misc, Prosper, p2p lending, peer-to-peer lending

 

Get Involved

Subscribe to Blog RSS Feed
  • Google Reader or Homepage
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to My AOL

Want to contribute to the blog? Submit a Post

Lenders

Prosper’s Media Roundup – 11/17/2009

By Prosper Blog on 11/17/09   [ ]

Prosper News Updates:
November 11, 2009
Fast Company: Peer-to-Peer Lending Explained: Brother, Can You Spare $100? By Lydia Dishman

November 11, 2009
Gerson Lehrman Group: The 5Cs of Credit, P2P Lending, Social Lending, Self-Directed Lending By Ronald Ingram
October 22, 2009:
NetBanker: Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces Join Forces to Influence Lawmakers with the “Coalition for New Credit Models By Jim Bruene
October 21, 2009:
American [...]

Read More

The Results From the Legal Collections Test

By Doug Fuller on 11/3/09   [ ]

Before discussing the results of the test, let’s review what we were testing. In November 2007, 74 loans that would have been included in the December Debt Sale were selected for a test of applying a legal collections strategy. These loans had an outstanding principal balance of approximately $705,000. They were placed at Hunt & Henriques, a prominent [...]

Read More

Collections – Hardship Arrangement are Benefiting Lenders

By Doug Fuller on 11/2/09   [ ]

One of the key challenges in collecting on unsecured installment loans is providing the borrower an incentive to continue to making payments when they come under financial distress. If you don’t make a payment  on a credit card you can’t keep charging on it. In the case of a house or a vehicle loan, the lender [...]

Read More

« Older Entries

Monthly Archive

Home | Personal Loans | Invest | Trade | Online Investing | About Us | Help
Site Map | Developers | Investment Opportunities | Privacy & Security | Policies | Terms of Use | Legal Agreements | Legal Compliance | Prospectus

Prosper, Prosper.com, and the Prosper logo are registered trademarks or service marks of Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Copyright © 2005-2009 Prosper Marketplace, Inc. All rights reserved.
This site has chosen a Thawte Certificate to improve Web site security Site privacy statement reviewed by TRUSTe