THREE YEARS OF CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE
July 2012 marks Prosper 2.0’s third birthday. Consistent loan performance over the past three years demonstrates the significant improvements made since Prosper’s pioneering 1.0 model. Over the past 36 months our investors have experienced 18 months of returns greater than 1%, 35 months of returns greater than 0.80%, and not a single down month.* Prosper 2.0’s performance underscores the fundamental durability of the returns available in consumer credit, a fact that remains greatly underappreciated by the majority of investors today.
Recently, TransUnion published a report on consumer credit trends. These indicate that U.S. credit card delinquencies continue to improve. As we review the article alongside recent Federal Reserve data, we realize that the improvement in credit delinquency trends speaks volumes to the changes in borrower behavior brought on by the calamity of the 2008 financial crisis. Consider the graph below that charts the history of consumer credit card delinquency and charge-off rates:
The charge-off data in this chart, reported since March of 1985, shows that the current reading of 4.25% ranks in the 40th percentile of this entire data range. In other words, 60% of the time, charge-off rates have been higher. Good, but certainly not extraordinary. Now, consider the shorter delinquency data series in grey. Beginning in March 1991, the delinquency reading was almost 6%. The current reading of 3.07% is the lowest on record.
The implications of this conclusion are profound. Delinquency rates are traditionally an excellent precursor for future charge-off rates. Low and falling delinquency rates suggest that future aggregate credit charge-off rates for consumer credit will continue to improve. However, more startling is that these improvements are occurring in the weakest economic recovery on record since World War II. This seems counterintuitive. One would expect to see improved credit performance during periods of economic growth like the boom of the mid-90s, for instance. Or the post-bubble period last decade. Instead, we see higher economic growth, lower unemployment and better income statistics, which should lead to improving credit performance. So what gives?
In our May Update, we discussed at some length the dramatic declines in net income and net worth experienced by American families since 2000. We think that the answer to the above question lies in the combination of this data and scars of the 2008 Financial Crisis. Very few experts dispute that throughout the remainder of this decade, we are likely to witness a massive deleveraging of the Western World’s balance sheet. A consequence of this will be sub-par economic growth, an environment that Bill Gross, the CIO of PIMCO, has dubbed the “new normal”.
So what would responsible credit worthy borrowers do in an environment of little future income growth and uncertain job stability? They would tend carefully to their debt – lowering interest costs where possible and insuring pay down of outstanding debt. And perhaps above all, they would preserve access to credit by staying current on their bills. Seen through this prism, improvements in consumer credit behavior make perfect sense as a rational adaptation to the brave new world of deleveraging. The upside? As an investor in P2P you can take advantage of this secular trend, helping creditworthy borrowers to achieve their logical goals and benefiting from consistent returns.
More information on July’s monthly performance update can be found here. For further explanation of this commentary or with any other questions or comments, please contact our investor marketing team at email@example.com or 1-877-611-8797.
*Platform Monthly Return on Principal for All Vintages (Seasoned & Unseasoned) is the dollar-weighted average return of all the discrete loan vintage returns for a given calendar month based on outstanding principal at the beginning of the month. For a loan vintage to be considered in the calendar return, it must fall between July 2009 and the month prior to the reporting month (e.g. the December 2010 calendar return would be the average return of loan vintages from July 2009 through November 2010). The periodic return for calendar month and respective loan vintages is calculated by taking the net payments received on borrower loans (which are net of principal repayment, credit losses, and servicing costs for such loans) as a percentage of the principal outstanding at the beginning of the period.
**To calculate the Return on Principal by monthly loan vintage, all payments received on borrower loans (which are net of principal repayment, credit losses, and servicing costs for such loans) originated during the month are aggregated and then divided by the average amount of aggregate outstanding principal. To annualize this return, it is divided by the dollar-weighted average age of the loans in months and then multiplied by 12. To be included in the Seasoned Returns calculations, Notes must be associated with a borrower loan originated at least 10 months prior; this calculation uses loans originated through August 31, 2011. Our research shows that loan portfolios that have reached 10 months of age more accurately reflect the likely long-term performance as the loans have had sufficient time to experience the impact of potential defaults. Seasoned Return is not necessarily indicative of future performance of any Notes.
Notes offered by Prospectus.
This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of our management and is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. You should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of the Prospectus for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause our actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above and in the Prospectus. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements that may be made in this presentation to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.